Materials simulation
ACHT architecture: plans the simulation, extracts data, computes and traces every figure to its run with SHA-256. VAP peer review. The verified dossier comes out of the pipeline, not a consultant.
Verified science dossier
Demo A: shell-to-bottom joint of a generic atmospheric tank, computed with finite elements. Every figure links to its results file, with its SHA-256, and to its logged run. It is published open, as UNSIGNED, for your review.
Also open: Calculators · Publications
01Methodology
Five stages, always in the same order. No figure reaches the dossier without the run that produced it.
Converts the question into a calculation plan: applicable standards, declared assumptions and acceptance criterion.
Gathers geometry, materials and published tests, each datum with its source.
Runs the finite elements and DEM, with mesh convergence study.
Cross-checks every figure against the record of its run and reference solutions.
Drafts the dossier; the engineer reviews and counter-signs it.
All of them run today; the right-hand column says how each one is checked.
| Module | What it does | Step | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEM engine | Geometries and particle simulations with implementación de referencia DEM on remote server | Compute | Calibrated against the published cone test of Li et al. (2021) |
| FE engine | S8R mesh, calculation with the finite-element solver, results in JSON | Compute | < 0.3 % vs exact solution and mesh convergence (Richardson) |
| Wear-life model | Relative steel plate life via two-segment power law calibrated with Monte Carlo | Compute | Monte Carlo of 200,000 samples, declared falsifiers |
| Web calculators | Three dependency-free calculators: silo Janssen, weld fatigue S-N, membrane stress | Report | 20 JS cases = Python at 1e-9 tolerance |
| Dossier builder | Generates self-contained scientific dossier: JSON, HTML in ES/EN, ZIP and SHA-256 | Report | Hash per figure and execution log |
| Paper pipeline (pf) | Orchestrates the full article lifecycle: ideation, experiments, submission | Plan / Verify | 105 accepted works, register as of 17-10-2026 |
| Anti-fabrication audit | Extracts numerical claims and verifies each value against attached artefacts | Verify | Claims checked against their artefacts |
| Proof ledger | Builds the unified submission ledger reproducibly and deterministically | Verify | Deterministic, verifiable with --check |
Geometries and particle simulations with implementación de referencia DEM on remote server
Calibrated against the published cone test of Li et al. (2021)
S8R mesh, calculation with the finite-element solver, results in JSON
< 0.3 % vs exact solution and mesh convergence (Richardson)
Relative steel plate life via two-segment power law calibrated with Monte Carlo
Monte Carlo of 200,000 samples, declared falsifiers
Three dependency-free calculators: silo Janssen, weld fatigue S-N, membrane stress
20 JS cases = Python at 1e-9 tolerance
Generates self-contained scientific dossier: JSON, HTML in ES/EN, ZIP and SHA-256
Hash per figure and execution log
Orchestrates the full article lifecycle: ideation, experiments, submission
105 accepted works, register as of 17-10-2026
Extracts numerical claims and verifies each value against attached artefacts
Claims checked against their artefacts
Builds the unified submission ledger reproducibly and deterministically
Deterministic, verifiable with --check
Dossier service and orchestrator: roadmap.
The five-step workflow rests on two published architectures of the AIXC Research platform.
An engine that generates and prioritises mechanistic hypotheses using causal graph learning and Bayesian optimal experimental design, maintaining an explicit belief state and replayable decision traces. [1, 2]
A verification architecture, first published for formal validation in time-series systems and extended to science agents and materials simulation, that gates every agent step against physics-informed constraints and formal checks. [3, 4]
VAP has been applied in three domains (financial time series, robotics for autonomous science and molecular simulation). ACHT and VAP are platform architectures: they were not used in the steel cases on this page.
Four categories, without brand names.
Cofounder and Chief Technology Officer (CTO), COIIAR no. 2653
Thirty years in finite elements. Designs the DEM and finite-element models, reviews the results and attests every dossier; none is released without his signature, except samples, which are published as UNSIGNED. Co-author of AIXC Research papers (see Publications).
Cofounder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Nearly five decades in technology and innovation; AI researcher since the 1990s. Former EVP at Meta, with senior leadership roles at Microsoft, Samsung and Oracle.
The chartered industrial engineer's signature is a professional attestation, not a qualified electronic signature.
A person, not the AI. The AI Scientist plans, extracts, computes, verifies and drafts; the signatory checks the results against their files and attests the dossier. Until then the dossier is UNSIGNED; afterwards it becomes SIGNED or REJECTED. The signature is a professional attestation, not a qualified electronic signature.
Every claim carries its evidence: the results file that produced it, with its hash, and the check applied. The granular material is checked against a published slump test (+7 % / −2 %), the finite elements against an exact solution (< 0.3 %) and the wear model against a steel that was not in the fit (4.8 %).
The notes are calculated on generic geometries and do not replace the standard for each part. Today each engine is checked on its own; feeding the DEM load directly into fatigue is under development. ACHT and VAP are architectures of the AIXC Research platform: we do not claim they were used in these cases. Product certification is issued by your certification body.
The drawings and data of a case are used only for that case and are not shared with third parties. We can sign a non-disclosure agreement before you send anything. A dossier is published only with the written permission of the data owner; the sample dossier uses a generic geometry.
Describe your materials question in an email: the load of a bulk material, the fatigue of a weld, the wear of a plate or a clay blend. We will tell you whether it can become a case study and with which data.
Write to info@aixcresearch.com